The journal "Dynamic Science and Technology Review" carries out a rigorous and trusted peer review process to ensure the quality and validity of each published article. Here are the main steps in our peer review process:

1. Manuscript Acceptance: The editor-in-charge reviews each manuscript submitted through our journal management system to ensure conformity with the journal's scope and writing guidelines.
2. Selection of Peer Reviewers: Manuscripts that pass the initial selection will be forwarded to peer reviewers with expertise and experience in the manuscript's topic. The identity of authors and peer reviewers is kept confidential (double-masked review).
3. Evaluation by Peer Reviewers: The peer reviewers will thoroughly evaluate the manuscript, including research methodology, originality of findings, clarity of presentation, and contribution to existing knowledge.
4. Feedback: Upon completion of the review, the peer reviewer will provide feedback to the authors, including suggestions for corrections or revisions needed to improve the quality of the manuscript.
5. Editorial Decision: Based on the peer reviewer's evaluation, the editor will make appropriate editorial decisions, such as accepting the manuscript without revision, accepting minor/major revisions, or rejecting the manuscript.
6. Revision and Further Review: If revisions are required, the authors are requested to make improvements according to the peer reviewers ' suggestions and submit the revised manuscript. The editor or peer reviewers will review the revised manuscript before making a final decision.
7. Publication: Accepted and approved manuscripts will be prepared for publication and published in the next issue of our journal.

By carrying out a careful and professional peer review process, we are committed to publishing high-quality articles that contribute meaningfully to developing knowledge in social science and community studies.